Return to Wildland Fire
Return to Northern Bobwhite site
Return to Working Lands for Wildlife site
Return to Working Lands for Wildlife site
Return to SE Firemap
Return to the Landscape Partnership Literature Gateway Website
RETURN TO LANDSCAPE PARTNERSHIP SITE
return to main site

Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Sections

Personal tools

You are here: Home / Learning & Tech Transfer / General Resources and Publications

General Resources and Publications

In the working lands library, you will find project reports, presentations, peer-reviewed studies, and more.

Decision Support Tools to Inform the Rehabilitation and Management of High Graded Forests

Decision Support Tools to Inform the Rehabilitation and Management of High Graded Forests

Abstract Numerous forests in the eastern United States have been degraded due to past exploitative timber harvesting known as high grading. High graded forest stands may not improve without active re- habilitation and may require targeted silvicultural treatments. This study focuses on high graded mixed-oak (mixed-Quercus spp.) stands and aims to develop a model that can identify past high grading and to determine modifications that may improve forest management recommendations provided by the prominent decision support tool, SILVAH. We present a model that uses standard forest inventory measurements and does not require knowledge of preharvest stand conditions to predict with moderate to high accuracy whether a stand was high graded, which could be par- ticularly useful for nonindustrial private forests. Results indicate that modifications to SILVAH may be necessary to improve its utility for prescribing silvicultural treatments in high graded stands. Study Implications: High graded forest stands are often not readily apparent and likely require specific forest management practices. We present a tool that uses standard forest inventory meas- urements to predict past high grading, which can be used to inform and prioritize forest manage- ment decisions. We also present suggested modifications to the prominent decision support tool, SILVAH, that may improve its ability to prescribe optimal silvicultural treatments for high graded stands. Results from this study provide forestry professionals/landowners working in the mixed- oak forests of the northeastern United States with tools to inform forest management decisions that aim to return degraded stands to healthier and more productive states.

Read More…

Golden-winged Warbler Landowner Outreach Mailer Template

Golden-winged Warbler Landowner Outreach Mailer Template

This editible mailer template from the Golden-winged Warbler Working Group is a great way to generate private landowner interest in your area! It outlines the importance and benefits of Golden-winged Warbler habitat and how landowners can participate or get more information.

Read More…

A Function-Based Framework for Stream Assessment and Restoration Projects

A Function-Based Framework for Stream Assessment and Restoration Projects

Download the Functional Framework for Stream Assessment and Restoration. This is the science-based development of the original function-based framework that is the basis for the SQT.

Read More…

SQT Expert Feedback - RECORDING

SQT Expert Feedback - RECORDING

Recording of a meeting with experts in Hellbender research to gather feedback on the draft Hellbender Stream Quantification Tool (SQT).

Read More…

NRCS WLFW Outcomes Assessment 2012-2018 (released 2021)

NRCS WLFW Outcomes Assessment 2012-2018 (released 2021)

An outcomes assessment report completed under a contract to Dr. JJ Apodaca from NRCS-WLFW. This document is being shared with conservation partners but broad or public sharing is not approved.

Read More…

Beta Testers Summary Feedback 4-19-2022

Beta Testers Summary Feedback 4-19-2022

Summary Data and Trends Illustrative Feedback

Read More…

Beta Tester Responses

Beta Tester Responses

All Indiv Responses Data

Read More…

Do Review Papers on Bird–Vegetation Relationships Provide Actionable Information to Forest Managers in the Eastern United States?

Do Review Papers on Bird–Vegetation Relationships Provide Actionable Information to Forest Managers in the Eastern United States?

Herein, we focus on a common problem of the science–practice interface in the context of forest wildlife habitat management. That is, are wildlife scientists providing information that is both relevant and specific enough to be actionable in real-world, evidence-based forest management contexts?

Read More…

What evidence exists for landbird species-environment relationships in eastern temperate and boreal forests of North America? A systematic map protocol

What evidence exists for landbird species-environment relationships in eastern temperate and boreal forests of North America? A systematic map protocol

In this systematic map, we propose to answer the review question: what evidence exists for bird species-environment relationships in eastern temperate and boreal forests of North America?

Read More…

Target Vegetation Metrics PDF

Target Vegetation Metrics PDF

Downloadable PDF of Target Vegetation Metrics types.

Read More…

Final Search String PDF

Final Search String PDF

Downloadable PDF of Final Search String definitions.

Read More…

Target Bird Metrics PDF

Target Bird Metrics PDF

Downloadable PDF of Target Bird Metrics definitions.

Read More…

Map of Fescue Belt

Map of Fescue Belt

Map of fescue belt within the U.S. superimposed over map of states participating in WLFW NOBO, Grasslands, and Savannas

Read More…

BBS Hotspots for Northern bobwhite

BBS Hotspots for Northern bobwhite

Hot spot map based on breeding bird survey data for northern bobwhite, as of 2011.

Read More…

Major Land Uses in WLFW NOBO, Grasslands, and Savannas

Major Land Uses in WLFW NOBO, Grasslands, and Savannas

Major land use types within the boundaries of the WLFW Northern bobwhite, Grasslands, and Savannas framework.

Read More…

Map of Row Crops Produced in NOBO Range

Map of Row Crops Produced in NOBO Range

Row crop production within WLFW Northern bobwhite, Grasslands, and Savannas framework boundaries.

Read More…

State Priority Areas for WLFW NOBO, Grasslands, and Savannas

State Priority Areas for WLFW NOBO, Grasslands, and Savannas

Beyond the national boundaries that each NRCS state offices selected, some chose to also identify priority areas that will be used in project ranking. (priority area shapefiles not uploaded yet!)

Read More…

National Project Boundaries for WLFW-NOBO, Grasslands, and Savannas

National Project Boundaries for WLFW-NOBO, Grasslands, and Savannas

Attached shapefiles combine all of the state input to create one cohesive, national map for the framework. Some states also identified priority areas within these boundaries, and those are posted in this same folder.

Read More…

New Jersey Priority Area Shapefiles

Northern Bobwhite Priority Areas, Northern Bobwhite Grasslands and Savannas Partnership 2022-2026

Read More…

West Virginia Priority Area Shapefiles

Northern Bobwhite Quail Priority Areas, Northern Bobwhite Grasslands and Savannas Partnership 2022-2026

Read More…